Mr C Maraj (3324122/2019) Mr D Wall (3324123/2019) Mr G Salmon (3324124/2019) Mr G Marsh (3324125/2019) Mr J Mitchell (3324126/2019) Mr M Naylor (3324127/2019) Mr P McGuinness (3324128/2019) Mr S Barker (3324129/2019) Mr T Kiely (3324130/2019) v DFDS Logistics Services Limited — 2020

Case reference: 3324122/2019
Decision date: 29 July 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Postle Dated

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr C Maraj (3324122/2019) Mr D Wall (3324123/2019) Mr G Salmon (3324124/2019) Mr G Marsh (3324125/2019) Mr J Mitchell (3324126/2019) Mr M Naylor (3324127/2019) Mr P McGuinness (3324128/2019) Mr S Barker (3324129/2019) Mr T Kiely (3324130/2019)

Respondent

DFDS Logistics Services Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The proceedings concerned claims by nine claimants against DFDS Logistics Services Limited, listed under case number 3324122/2019 to 3324130/2019. The judgment records that the claims were withdrawn by the claimants. The tribunal therefore dismissed the proceedings following that withdrawal.

No substantive findings on liability, remedy, or costs are set out in the judgment text provided. The document contains no award of compensation or other monetary relief.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claims by the claimants.	Withdrawn	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.