Case 3324218/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Fletcher v Mr Raj Vorelli — 2021
- Case reference
- 3324218/2019
- Decision date
- 13 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Fletcher
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment by Employment Judge Quill in favour of the claimant, Mr C Fletcher, against the respondent, Mr Raj Vorelli. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of 223.00.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £118.25, recording the calculation as based on 6 weeks' employment, no annual leave taken, and a weekly salary of £183.00, using the figure 6/52 x 5.6 x £183.00. No other remedies were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of 223.00. | Upheld | — | £223 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered £118.25, calculated on 6 weeks' employment, no annual leave taken, and a weekly salary of £183.00 (6/52 x 5.6 x £183.00). | Upheld | — | £118 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £341
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.