Case 3324262/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Parker (Husband). For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 3324262/2019
- Decision date
- 31 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Appearances
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr Parker (Husband). For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not attend and was not represented. Employment Judge Postle recorded that the respondent was in breach of s.188A(1)(a) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, and that the claimant was entitled individually to bring a claim for a protective award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Protective award claim under s.188/s.188A TULRCA 1992; the judgment ordered a 90-day protected period and remuneration under s.190(2), but no monetary sum was stated in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.188A(1)(a) TULRCA 1992
- s.188 TULRCA 1992
- s.190(2) TULRCA 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.