Case 3324322/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Norwood v Potters Bar Golf Club — 2026
- Case reference
- 3324322/2019
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Norwood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge R Lewis recorded that the respondent, Potters Bar Golf Club, was ordered to pay Mr T Norwood a redundancy payment of £2,340.00. The judgment states the figure was calculated as 12 x 1.5 x 130.
No other claims or issues are identified in the extracted judgment text. The decision is limited to the redundancy payment award and does not set out any separate findings on breach of contract, unlawful deduction from wages, or other heads of claim.
The judgment does not record a panel, hearing attendance, or any legal tests applied beyond the Rule 21 format. It is therefore treated as a straightforward monetary award in favour of the claimant for redundancy pay only.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Rule 21 judgment ordered the respondent to pay a redundancy payment of £2,340.00, described as 12 x 1.5 x 130. | Upheld | — | £2,340 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,340
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.