Case 3324368/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Mooney v Hamiltons Oxford Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3324368/2019
- Decision date
- 20 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Mooney
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent had not presented a response by 6 January 2020, so Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto decided the case on the available material under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. On that basis, the tribunal found that Miss C Mooney was unfairly dismissed and ordered a basic award of £2,905.98 together with a compensatory award of £17,362.71.
The judgment states that the compensatory award included notice pay, unpaid wages and holiday pay. It also records that the claimant had not been provided with a written statement of terms and conditions as required by section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and awarded £781 pursuant to section 38 of the Employment Act 2002.
The tribunal further stated that the uplift provisions in section 207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 do not apply to a redundancy dismissal. No panel members were listed with the judgment, which was issued by Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto sitting alone.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Rule 21 judgment; basic award of £2,905.98 and compensatory award of £17,362.71. The compensatory award was stated to include notice pay, unpaid wages and holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £20,269 |
| Other | Award of £781 under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide a written statement of terms and conditions required by section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £781 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £21,050
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,906
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £17,363
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
4 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 38 Employment Act 2002
- section 207A Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.