Case 3324456/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss T Wheeler v Visalogic Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3324456/2019
- Decision date
- 10 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss T Wheeler
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Anstis, sitting alone at Reading, held that Miss T Wheeler was unfairly dismissed by Visalogic Limited. The tribunal recorded that the claimant was awarded £3,323.51 as compensation for unfair dismissal.
The written judgment also states that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker’s Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996 apply. It identifies a prescribed element of £2,154.28 covering 24 July 2019 to 10 July 2020, and a balance of £1,169.23. No separate basic award, injury to feelings award, or other heads of loss are set out in the written record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed and awarded £3,323.51 as compensation. The written record states that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker’s Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996 apply, with a prescribed element of £2,154.28 for 24 July 2019 to 10 July 2020 and a balance of £1,169.23. | Upheld | — | £3,324 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,324
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £3,324
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.