Case 3324478/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Brown v Millharbour Digital Limited in creditors’ voluntary liquidation — 2021
- Case reference
- 3324478/2019
- Decision date
- 29 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Brown
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Stephanie Brown began working for Millharbour Digital Limited on 25 May 2016 as a studio artworker and was dismissed on 24 August 2019. The respondent did not enter a response, and the claim was undefended. The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence and found that she was dismissed by reason of redundancy and that the dismissal was procedurally and substantively unfair.
On remedy, the tribunal found that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,153.86 because of her age and length of service. It also noted that she earned £20,000 per annum, equivalent to £384.62 gross per week, with monthly take-home pay of £1,375.39. She was out of work for two months before starting a new role on 21 October 2019 at a significantly higher rate of pay.
For unfair dismissal, the tribunal awarded £2,750.78 for two months' net pay and £200 for loss of statutory rights, making a compensatory award of £2,950.78. The tribunal limited the award because it considered there was a likelihood that she would have been made redundant in 2020 in any event. It did not make a separate basic award because the redundancy payment was its equivalent, and it recorded that the recoupment provisions did not apply.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the dismissal was procedurally and substantively unfair. It awarded compensation of £2,750.78 for two months' net pay plus £200 for loss of statutory rights, and did not make a separate basic award because the redundancy payment was treated as its equivalent. | Upheld | — | £2,951 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment in this amount, based on her age and length of service. | Upheld | — | £1,154 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,105
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £2,951
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.