Case 3324480/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Campos v Winkworth Machinery Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3324480/2019
- Decision date
- 9 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Campos
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Reading by CVP on 9 October 2020 before Employment Judge Anstis sitting alone. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel, Mr J Feeny.
The written judgment records only that "the claimant's claim is struck out". No further reasons are set out in the published text, and the note states that reasons were given orally at the hearing but written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time. The judgment therefore records a strike-out of the claim without a published explanation of the underlying merits or of any separate treatment of the listed breach of contract and unlawful deduction from wages issues.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The written judgment only states that the claimant's claim was struck out; it does not separately set out reasoning for individual causes of action. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written judgment only states that the claimant's claim was struck out; it does not separately set out reasoning for individual causes of action. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.