Case 3324492/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Ms Yve Montaz, (Advocate) — 2019
- Case reference
- 3324492/2019
- Decision date
- 12 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the claimant's unlawful deduction of wages claim was well founded and ordered the respondent to pay £918.76 gross. In the reasons, it accepted that the parties agreed the claimant earned £3,387.90 gross between 25 March and 18 July 2019 and had been paid £2,783.55 net, leaving a difference of £604.35. After taking account of a further payment of £566.11 gross made in August 2019, the tribunal found an outstanding deduction of £38.24 gross.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was entitled to be paid during the school holidays because her contract provided for 5 days a week, 35.75 hours per week at £8.21 per hour and did not say she was not entitled to holiday pay or that term-time earnings were to be amortised over the holidays. It rejected the respondent's case that the claimant had resigned with effect from 18 July 2019 and did not accept the witness statement relied on for that proposition.
On the claimant's account of her end date, the tribunal relied on the pleaded case and found she was entitled to 3 weeks' pay, calculated at 35.75 hours per week for 3 weeks at £8.21 per hour, producing £880.52. The tribunal therefore treated the unlawful deduction claim as covering the £38.24 underpayment and the £880.52 found due in the reasons. It separately found holiday pay due in the sum of £43.45 gross, calculated from 19 weeks' employment and a figure of £600.56 less £557.11 already paid. The respondent's contract claim was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of £918.76 gross (subject to tax and National Insurance). In the reasons it calculated an underpayment of £38.24 gross and then found the claimant was entitled to 3 weeks' pay at £8.21 per hour, amounting to £880.52. | Upheld | — | £919 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to holiday pay and ordered £43.45 gross (subject to tax and National Insurance). It found 19 weeks' employment, calculated holiday entitlement at £600.56, and deducted £557.11 already paid. | Upheld | — | £43 |
| Breach of contract | The respondent's contract claim was dismissed. The judgment does not record any monetary award for this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £962
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.