Case 3324497/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Jeffries v Hamiltons Oxford Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3324497/2019
- Decision date
- 15 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Jeffries
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal made a Rule 21 judgment because the time limit for presenting a response had expired on 23 December 2019 and no response had been presented. On the available material, Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto found that Miss C Jeffries had been unfairly dismissed.
For that unfair dismissal claim, the tribunal awarded a basic award of £2,635.88 and a compensatory award of £18,206.82. The judgment states that the compensatory award included notice pay, unpaid wages and holiday pay.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had not been provided with a written statement of terms and conditions as required by section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It ordered the respondent to pay £781 pursuant to section 38 of the Employment Act 2002.
The judgment further records that the uplift provisions in section 207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 do not apply to a redundancy dismissal.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal awarded a basic award of £2,635.88 and a compensatory award of £18,206.82 for unfair dismissal. The compensatory award included notice pay, unpaid wages and holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £20,843 |
| Other | The claimant was not provided with a written statement of terms and conditions required by section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and the tribunal ordered £781 pursuant to section 38 of the Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £781 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £21,624
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,636
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £18,207
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
4 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 38 of the Employment Act 2002
- section 207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.