Case 3324540/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v The Seven Stars — 2020
- Case reference
- 3324540/2019
- Decision date
- 25 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cassel Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Charlotte Graves claimed notice pay after her employment with The Seven Stars ended on 12 September 2019. The respondent resisted the claim on the basis that her employment had been terminated for gross misconduct and therefore no week's notice pay was due; alternatively it argued that any sum should be calculated on 25 hours rather than the 32.5 hours claimed by the claimant.
The hearing proceeded by telephone on 24 April 2020 after the respondent did not provide a contact number. The claimant gave oral evidence consistent with her claim form. She said she had given written notice of resignation, to take effect on 6 October 2019, and had handed that notice to Ms Julie Baker, one of the joint owners. She also said that she had spoken to Mr Ken Culpeck, the other co-owner, who made clear that she was not required to work her notice period.
The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence. It found that she had not been summarily dismissed, that there had been no hearing, and that no specific allegations of misconduct had been put to her. On that basis, the tribunal treated the claim as one for breach of contract in relation to notice pay.
The tribunal accepted the claimant's calculation that she had been booked for 32.5 hours during the notice period at £9 per hour. It therefore ordered the respondent to pay £292.50 gross, subject to tax and national insurance deductions for which the respondent must account to the claimant and HMRC.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim for notice pay following termination of employment. The tribunal accepted the claimant's account and awarded £292.50 gross. | Upheld | — | £293 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £293
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.