Case 3324588/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Southey v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 3324588/2019
- Decision date
- 24 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Vowles Date
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr C Southey
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a response to the claim, so judgment was entered in favour of the claimant under Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment records the claim under the heading "Unfair Constructive Dismissal."
The tribunal stated that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and that the complaint succeeded. No remedy was fixed at this stage. The tribunal said the claimant's remedy would be determined at a remedy hearing to be listed later, and directed the claimant to provide a statement within 28 days setting out the claim in monetary terms, with mitigation and earnings details and supporting documents where appropriate.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Judgment entered under Rule 21 because the respondent did not present a response. The judgment states that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and that the complaint succeeds, with remedy to be determined at a later remedy hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.