Case 3324590/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F Trusler v Technology Enabled Learning Ltd (In Voluntary Liquidation) — 2020
- Case reference
- 3324590/2019
- Decision date
- 7 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F Trusler
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Foxwell recorded that Technology Enabled Learning Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr F Trusler's wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £18,750.00 in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found that Mr Trusler had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. Damages were awarded in the sum of £2,844.65. The judgment does not set out any separate reasoning beyond the brief findings and awards recorded in the standard template.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £18,750.00. | Upheld | — | £18,750 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £2,844.65. | Upheld | — | £2,845 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £21,595
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.