Case 3324616/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs G Savvas v Brimsdown Fish Bar Ltd Heard by Cloud video — 2021
- Case reference
- 3324616/2019
- Decision date
- 31 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reed
- Panel members
- Mr T Poil, Mr A Scott
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs G Savvas
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case by Cloud video on 31 March 2021 before Employment Judge Reed, with Mr T Poil and Mr A Scott sitting as the non-legal members. Neither party attended. The written record states that the respondent had been dissolved.
The tribunal's unanimous judgment was that the claim was dismissed. The record does not set out any substantive findings on the underlying national minimum wage, unlawful deduction, or working time issues, and it gives no monetary award.
The decision is a short disposal judgment only. It also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless a timely request was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The short judgment records that the respondent had been dissolved and that the claim was dismissed. It does not separately analyse the wage deduction head. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The short judgment records that the respondent had been dissolved and that the claim was dismissed. It does not separately analyse the working time head. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.