Case 3324662/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Almond & others (see attached schedule) v Thomas Cook In Destination Management Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 3324662/2019
- Decision date
- 7 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms C Almond & others (see attached schedule)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letters dated 8 March 2022, the Tribunal gave the claimants an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why their claims should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.
The claimants did not make written representations, or did not make representations sufficient to answer that concern, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claims.
The judgment does not record any substantive determination on liability or compensation. It is a procedural strikeout only, signed by Employment Judge Ainscough on 1 April 2022 and sent to the parties on 7 April 2022.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award category inferred from the case context; the reasons only state that the claims were struck out for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | Redundancy category inferred from the case context; the reasons only state that the claims were struck out for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.