Case 3324712/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Worters v Thomas Ridley And Son Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3324712/2019
- Decision date
- 30 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Worters
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mrs S Worters' unfair dismissal claim was well founded and succeeded against Thomas Ridley and Son Ltd. It ordered the respondent to pay compensation of £7,488.44.
That award comprised a gross basic award of £5,761.94 and a net compensatory award of £1,226.50. The compensatory award included a 10% uplift for breach of the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015.
The tribunal also awarded £500 for loss of statutory rights and declared that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 did not apply.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Single claim. The tribunal awarded £7,488.44 in total, made up of a basic award of £5,761.94, a compensatory award of £1,226.50, and £500 for loss of statutory rights. The compensatory award included a 10% uplift for breach of the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015. | Upheld | — | £7,488 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,488
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £5,762
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £1,227
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.