Case 3324730/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Bryant-Jones v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 3324730/2019
- Decision date
- 5 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Vowles
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr S Bryant-Jones
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Respondent did not present a response to the claim, so the tribunal entered judgment for the Claimant under Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No contested evidential findings or legal analysis were recorded beyond that default judgment process.
The tribunal found that the Claimant was owed wages and awarded £200 for unpaid wages. It also found that the Claimant was owed holiday pay and awarded £450 for unpaid holiday pay. The total award was £650, which the Respondent was ordered to pay to the Claimant.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment under Rule 21 after the Respondent failed to present a response; the Claimant was awarded £200 for unpaid wages. | Upheld | — | £200 |
| Holiday pay | Judgment under Rule 21 after the Respondent failed to present a response; the Claimant was awarded £450 for unpaid holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £450 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £650
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £650
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.