Case 3324747/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Cowell v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 3324747/2019
- Decision date
- 31 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr D Cowell
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Respondent, JAS Master Limited, did not present a response to the claim. Under Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, Employment Judge Anstis entered judgment in favour of Mr D Cowell on the basis of the material before the tribunal.
The tribunal found that the Respondent had breached the Claimant's contract. It ordered the Respondent to pay Mr Cowell £2,150 in compensation. No other claims or remedies are identified in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Judgment was entered under Rule 21 after the Respondent failed to present a response. The tribunal held that the Respondent had breached the Claimant's contract and awarded £2,150 in compensation. | Upheld | — | £2,150 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,150
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £2,150
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.