Case 3324771/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Employment tribunal upholds unlawful-deduction-from-wages claim against Boss Security Ltd& Others
The judgment records that the claim was brought against Boss Security Ltd and Others under case number 3324771/2019. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £2,930.85 as arrears of pay.
- Case reference
- 3324771/2019
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge QUILL
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Qazi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Quill found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr A Qazi's wages. The judgment records that the claim was brought against Boss Security Ltd and Others under case number 3324771/2019.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay Mr Qazi the gross sum of £2,930.85 as arrears of pay. No separate breakdown of the award is given beyond that sum, and the judgment does not record any additional remedy components.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The respondent was found to have made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and was ordered to pay the gross sum of £2,930.85 as arrears of pay. | Upheld | — | £2,931 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,931
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.