Vol. I·6 May 2026

Search the index

Loading…

Loading page content.

Tribunal Watch

A structured, cross-cut index of UK employment tribunal decisions, built from the primary record at gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions. Independent of HMCTS and the Ministry of Justice.

Not legal advice. Information on this site is a matter of public record; it is not guidance on any individual case.

Editorial

About this site
Methodology
Corrections policy
Editorial standards

Rights & privacy

Open Government Licence v3.0
Privacy notice
Data subject requests
Atom feed (recent decisions)

Miss H Ballerino v The Racecourse Association Limited — Employment Tribunal 2021 | Tribunal Watch

Tribunal Watch/The Racecourse Association Limited/3324824/2019

Case 3324824/2019 · Employment Tribunal

Miss H Ballerino v The Racecourse Association Limited — 2021

Case reference: 3324824/2019
Decision date: 20 October 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Anstis

Indexed: 25 April 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss H Ballerino

Respondent

The Racecourse Association Limited

Claims brought

6 categories

Breach of contract
Pregnancy and maternity discrimination
Sex discrimination
Unfair dismissal
Unlawful deduction from wages
Working time regulations

Source tags (gov.uk)

Breach of Contract
Maternity and Pregnancy Rights
Sex Discrimination
Unfair Dismissal
Unlawful Deduction from Wages and Working Time Regulations

Outcomes per claim are extracted in a second pass and are not yet published on this page.

Source document

Primary record

The full judgment is available on gov.uk under the .

Open Government Licence v3.0

Judgment 1 (PDF)
Judgment 2 (PDF)
Judgment 3 (PDF)
Judgment 4 (PDF)
Judgment 5 (PDF)
Judgment 6 (PDF)
Judgment 7 (PDF)
Judgment 8 (PDF)
Judgment 9 (PDF)

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.