Case 3324862/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss I Bampatsia v Hi Quality Foods Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3324862/2019
- Decision date
- 27 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss I Bampatsia
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto found that Hi Quality Foods Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Miss I Bampatsia’s wages. The respondent was ordered to pay £1,900 in respect of that claim.
The judgment also records that the respondent failed to comply with sections 1 and 4 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. In consequence, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,464 pursuant to section 38 of the Employment Act 2002.
The judgment is brief and does not set out extended reasoning beyond those findings and awards. The total amount ordered by the tribunal was £3,364.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,900 |
| Other | The judgment records that the respondent failed to comply with sections 1 and 4 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and ordered payment of £1,464 pursuant to section 38 of the Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £1,464 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,364
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.