Case 3324864/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Ashok Birdy v Dnata Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3324864/2019
- Decision date
- 14 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Ashok Birdy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant's complaint was not well founded and dismissed it. The written judgment does not set out the factual findings or legal reasoning because reasons were given orally at the hearing.
No monetary award or remedy was made in the written judgment. The document does not identify any lay panel members or any discrimination-related protected characteristic.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written judgment states only that the claimant's complaint was not well founded and was dismissed. It does not specify the legal category or categories of the complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.