Case 3324906/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Employment tribunal upholds unfair-dismissal claim against And Telefonica UK Limited
The only substantive liability finding recorded was that the claimant was unfairly dismissed, and that complaint succeeded. No remedy was fixed in the judgment itself.
- Case reference
- 3324906/2019
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Vowles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Griffiths
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the respondent had stated the claim was not contested, and it therefore entered judgment in favour of the claimant under Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The only substantive liability finding recorded was that Mr L Griffiths was unfairly dismissed, and that complaint succeeded.
No remedy was fixed in the judgment itself. The tribunal stated that the remedy would be determined at a later remedy hearing, and directed the claimant to provide a schedule of loss and details of mitigation within 28 days, with supporting documents where appropriate.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The respondent stated that the claim was not contested. The tribunal entered judgment under Rule 21 and held that the claimant was unfairly dismissed. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.