Case 3324946/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Jones v Dapper Sandwich Company Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3324946/2019
- Decision date
- 20 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn its judgment dated 2 October 2020, the tribunal found that Mr A Jones had suffered unlawful deductions from wages in the sum of £223.04. It also found that, at the end of his employment, he had accrued 9 days' holiday entitlement valued at £692.10 gross at a gross daily rate of £76.90.
The tribunal further found that Mr Jones was dismissed in breach of contract and awarded £1,230.40 net, described as four weeks' notice pay. The judgment states that the total amounts due were £1,453.44 net and £692.10 gross.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unlawful deductions from wages in the sum of £223.04. | Upheld | — | £223 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found 9 days' accrued holiday entitlement at the end of employment, valued at £692.10 gross using a gross daily rate of £76.90. | Upheld | — | £692 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract and awarded £1,230.40 net, representing four weeks' notice pay. | Upheld | — | £1,230 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,146
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.