Case 3324972/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Shah v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 3324972/2019
- Decision date
- 25 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr S Shah
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Total Solutions Group (London) Limited did not present a response to the claim. Under Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, judgment was therefore entered for the claimant, Mr S Shah, on the basis of the claim as presented.
The judgment states that Mr Shah was owed unpaid wages and awards him £3,172.92 in compensation, payable by the respondent. No separate split of the award is given and no further findings or legal reasoning are set out in the short written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment entered because the respondent did not present a response. | Upheld | — | £3,173 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,173
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.