Case 3325121/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Ms T Smith v Norwich City Council — 2020
- Case reference
- 3325121/2017
- Decision date
- 6 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms T Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 14 January 2020 the Tribunal made an order requiring the claimant to show cause why the claims should not be struck out as no longer actively pursued. The judgment records that the claimant did not respond to that order.
Employment Judge Postle therefore dismissed the claims against Norwich City Council on 12 March 2020, stating that they were clearly no longer actively pursued. The judgment does not record any findings on the substantive merits of the claims and does not award any remedy. The decision was sent to the parties on 6 April 2020.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed after the claimant failed to respond to the Tribunal Order of 14 January 2020 to show cause why the claim should not be struck out as no longer actively pursued. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed after the claimant failed to respond to the Tribunal Order of 14 January 2020 to show cause why the claim should not be struck out as no longer actively pursued. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.