Case 3325202/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Francis v And DW Contractors (Oxford) Limited (Response rejected) — 2020
- Case reference
- 3325202/2019
- Decision date
- 3 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Francis
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal proceeded under Rule 21 after the respondent, DW Contractors (Oxford) Limited, submitted a response out of time and without an application for an extension, so the response was rejected. The judgment then recorded findings that the respondent had breached the claimant’s contract, made unlawful deductions from the claimant’s wages, and failed to pay holiday pay due to him.
No remedy figure was set out in the judgment. Instead, the tribunal said by separate letter that it had asked the claimant to provide details of the amount claimed so that it could consider whether a remedy judgment could be issued under Rule 21 without a hearing or whether a hearing would be required.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.