Case 3325429/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Richardson v Sheer Perfection Beauty Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3325429/2019
- Decision date
- 20 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Richardson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn a short reasons judgment, Employment Judge Ord struck out the claimant's case against Sheer Perfection Beauty Ltd. The tribunal recorded that, by a letter dated 13 April 2021, the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for non-compliance with the tribunal's order of 12 November 2020 and because it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis the tribunal struck out the claim. The hearing fixed for 20 August 2021 did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim because the claimant had not complied with the order dated 12 November 2020 and had not actively pursued it. After the letter dated 13 April 2021, the claimant did not make representations or request a hearing, or did not make sufficient representations, why the claim should not be struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.