Case 3325447/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Winstone v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 3325447/2019
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heal Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Winstone
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant withdrew the claim. Following that withdrawal, the proceedings were dismissed under rule 52.
The judgment contains no findings on the merits of the underlying complaints and records no remedy or monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment text does not separately identify this claim, but it appears in the gov.uk listing categories. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment text does not separately identify this claim, but it appears in the gov.uk listing categories. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment text does not separately identify this claim, but it appears in the gov.uk listing categories. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment text does not separately identify this claim, but it appears in the gov.uk listing categories. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.