Case 3325457/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D McCarthy v Silenster Building Services Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 3325457/2019
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smail Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D McCarthy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the proceedings in case 3325457/2019 were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant, Mr D McCarthy. The extracted text does not set out any substantive findings on liability, so no merits determination is recorded in the judgment text supplied.
On the information available from the extraction, the matter included race discrimination and Working Time Regulations claims, but the judgment does not describe the factual basis of either claim or any tribunal analysis of them. The only disposal stated is dismissal after withdrawal.
No remedy, award, or costs order is recorded in the supplied text. The judgment is dated 1/9/20 and signed by Employment Judge Smail.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The extracted judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. No merits findings are set out in the text supplied. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Working time regulations | The extracted judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. No merits findings are set out in the text supplied. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.