Case 3325466/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Y Long v Underground Retail Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3325466/2019
- Decision date
- 13 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Y Long
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Bedeau issued a Rule 21 judgment on 12 February 2020 after no response had been received from Underground Retail Ltd. The tribunal recorded that Miss Y Long’s claims for unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay succeeded on that basis.
The tribunal also held that Miss Y Long was not entitled to redundancy pay because she had not been working for the Respondent for at least two years. The case was listed for a remedy hearing, with notice to follow, so no monetary award was set in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim for unpaid wages succeeded because no response had been received from the Respondent under Rule 21. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claim for unpaid holiday pay succeeded because no response had been received from the Respondent under Rule 21. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal held that the Claimant was not entitled to redundancy pay because she had not been working for the Respondent for at least two years. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.