Case 3325467/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Underground Retail Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3325467/2019
- Decision date
- 7 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was issued under Rule 21 on the papers. In case numbers 3325467/2019 and 3325468/2019, Employment Judge Alliott recorded that the respondent, Underground Retail Limited, had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and had also failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement.
On the wages claim, the tribunal upheld the claim and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,666.67. On the holiday pay claim, the tribunal also upheld the claim and ordered payment of the gross sum of £249.84.
The judgment does not set out any additional findings, legal test, or separate remedy calculation beyond those two sums. No lay members are listed, and no discrimination or dismissal issue is recorded in the supplied text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,666.67. | Upheld | — | £1,667 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £249.84. | Upheld | — | £250 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,917
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.