Case 3325511/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Eaton (family friend) For the v Mr Stephen Meeks (Group Chairman) — 2020
- Case reference
- 3325511/2019
- Decision date
- 28 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Eaton (family friend) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Paul Lee worked for Smarter Data Management Limited from 20 March 2017 as an electrician’s mate. The tribunal found that the working arrangement with another electrician, Alex Minns, was becoming untenable by the end of 2018, and that the claimant had been told he needed to obtain a full driving licence so that he could travel to work. The claimant obtained a provisional licence in January 2019 and the tribunal accepted that he was making efforts to obtain a licence.
The tribunal found that in March 2019 the respondent decided to terminate the claimant’s employment because there was no local work for him and he had not yet obtained a full driving licence. It held that the dismissal was procedurally unfair because there had been no consultation or warning before dismissal. The claimant was unemployed for nine weeks and then obtained alternative work on 24 June 2019 on comparable pay.
In assessing compensation, the tribunal concluded that if a fair procedure had been followed there was a 50% chance that the claimant would still have lost his job, either by reason of redundancy or because he did not yet have a full driving licence. It therefore awarded compensation for 4.5 weeks of net pay during the period of unemployment, plus a basic award and a separate sum for loss of statutory rights. The tribunal recorded that the claimant did not seek reinstatement or re-engagement.
The final award was £3,781.28, made up of a basic award of £1,050, a compensatory award of £2,231.28, and £500 for loss of statutory rights. The tribunal also recorded that the claimant was not in receipt of state benefits between 19 April and 24 June 2019, so the recoupment provisions did not apply.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the dismissal procedurally unfair because there was no consultation or warning before dismissal. It reduced compensation on the basis that, had a fair procedure been followed, there was a 50% chance the claimant would still have lost his job for redundancy or for not holding a full driving licence. | Upheld | — | £3,781 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,781
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,050
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £2,231
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.