Case 3325517/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In Person v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 3325517/2019
- Decision date
- 5 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kurrein THE
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In Person
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not enter a response and did not attend the telephone hearing on 5 June 2020. Employment Judge Kurrein therefore entered default judgment under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 on the material available to the tribunal.
On that basis, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's pay, had failed to pay him in respect of accrued and untaken holiday, had failed to give notice or pay in lieu, and had failed to reimburse legitimate expenses. Each claim was upheld.
The tribunal ordered payment of the specific net sums stated in the judgment: £3,852.99 for unauthorised deductions, £1,244.74 for holiday pay, £3,556.60 for notice or pay in lieu, and £241.77 for unreimbursed expenses. The judgment states that these sums were calculated net after deduction of income tax and national insurance contributions and were to be paid without further deduction.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Default judgment under Rule 21: the tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's pay and ordered payment of £3,852.99 net. | Upheld | — | £3,853 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant in respect of accrued and untaken holiday and ordered £1,244.74 net. | Upheld | — | £1,245 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent failed to give notice or pay in lieu and ordered compensation of £3,556.60 net. | Upheld | — | £3,557 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal also found the respondent failed to reimburse legitimate expenses and ordered £241.77 net. | Upheld | — | £242 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,896
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.