Case 3325529/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms P Fallowfield v Bauhaus Educational Services Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3325529/2019
- Decision date
- 17 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms P Fallowfield
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Ms P Fallowfield, brought claims against Bauhaus Educational Services Limited for notice pay, holiday pay and unpaid wages. The tribunal dismissed the notice pay claim.
The holiday pay claim succeeded and the respondent was ordered to pay £221.52. The unpaid wages claim also succeeded, with an award of £300.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to provide the claimant with written terms and conditions of employment as required by sections 1 and 4 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It ordered payment of £369.22 pursuant to section 38 of the Employment Act 2002. The total payable under the judgment was £890.74.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim for notice pay failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £222 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £300 |
| Other | Award made pursuant to section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide written terms and conditions of employment required by sections 1 and 4 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £369 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £891
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.