Case 3325546/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Kalia v Travelport Worldwide Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 3325546/2019
- Decision date
- 29 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Kalia
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Hyams Date recorded that, in case numbers 3325546/2019, 3326302/2019 and 3327985/2019, the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claims by Miss Kalia. The judgment contains no findings on the merits of the disability discrimination, race discrimination, unfair dismissal or interim relief issues. No remedy or award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims by the Claimant; no merits findings are set out. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Other | This covers the interim relief matter listed in the case context. The judgment records only dismissal following withdrawal and contains no merits findings. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims by the Claimant; no merits findings are set out. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims by the Claimant; no merits findings are set out. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.