Case 3325714/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Hodder Mrs K Stewart v Vale and Downland Museum (Trading) Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 3325714/2017
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Manley Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Hodder Mrs K Stewart
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written record states that the proceedings under case numbers 3325714/2017, 3325924/2017 and 3325925/2017 were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claims by the claimants, Mr P Hodder and Mrs K Stewart, against Vale and Downland Museum (Trading) Limited.
The judgment does not set out any findings on the facts, the merits of the claims, or any remedy. It records only the withdrawal-based dismissal and gives the date of the judgment as 11 November 2019.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The written judgment only states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims. The claim type is inferred from the GOV.UK listing category because the short judgment does not separately identify the pleaded causes of action. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment only states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims. The claim type is inferred from the GOV.UK listing category because the short judgment does not separately identify the pleaded causes of action. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.