Case 3325724/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Frame For the v Mr James Lamb and others — 2020
- Case reference
- 3325724/2019
- Decision date
- 4 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge King Members
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Frame For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Norwich on 4 November 2020, Employment Judge King heard the matter with the claimant representative Mr D Frame and no respondent present. The written record states that the claims against the third respondent, Mr James Lamb, were dismissed.
The judgment does not identify the substantive legal type or types of the claims against Mr Lamb in the extracted text. It also states that the claims against the other respondents continued, so this was not a final disposal of the wider proceedings.
The record notes that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No remedy or monetary award is recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written judgment only records that the claims against the third respondent, Mr James Lamb, were dismissed. The underlying legal type(s) of those claims are not specified in the extracted text, and claims against the other respondents continued. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.