Case 3325830/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Morris v Thomas Cook UK Travel Ltd (in Compulsory Liquidation) and The Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy — 2022
- Case reference
- 3325830/2019
- Decision date
- 12 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough Date
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment in a protective award claim. The first respondent did not present a response, and the Official Receiver confirmed the claim would not be contested. The tribunal therefore determined the matter on the papers without a hearing.
On the information before it, the tribunal found that Thomas Cook UK Travel Limited employed over 20 employees at Peterborough Westpoint. The first respondent went into compulsory liquidation on 23 September 2019, the Official Receiver was appointed at 1:47am that day, and the claimant was notified that her employment was terminated on 8 October 2019.
The tribunal found there had been no proper warning or notice to, or consultation with, the recognised trade unions or the claimant. There was no consultation with the claimant between 23 September 2019 and 8 October 2019, and no employee representatives had been elected or appointed for consultation under section 188A. The tribunal held that the first respondent was in breach of section 188 of the 1992 Act.
The claim under section 189 was therefore well-founded, and the tribunal made a protective award in favour of the claimant for the maximum protected period of 90 days beginning on 23 September 2019. The judgment also records that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker's Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996 apply, and sets out the employer's recoupment obligations.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award claim under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 for failure to comply with section 188 collective consultation requirements. The tribunal made an award for the maximum protected period of 90 days beginning on 23 September 2019. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 188 TULRCA 1992
- section 189 TULRCA 1992
- rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.