Case 3326021/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Conway v Brundell Boat Builders Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3326021/2019
- Decision date
- 25 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Conway
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr P Conway's claim against Brundell Boat Builders Ltd, described as now dissolved, was dismissed. The extracted text does not break the outcome down by head of claim, but the case listing identifies breach of contract, unlawful deduction from wages, and working time issues.
No separate findings of fact, legal analysis, or monetary remedy are set out in the text provided. The judgment is a short dispositive order made by Employment Judge Postle on 18 December 2023 and sent to the parties on 25 January 2024.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment gives a single dismissal order and does not separately identify reasoning for this pleaded head of claim in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment gives a single dismissal order and does not separately identify reasoning for this pleaded head of claim in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment gives a single dismissal order and does not separately identify reasoning for this pleaded head of claim in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.