Case 3326162/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Brayshaw, Claimant’s partner and lay representative v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 3326162/2019
- Decision date
- 17 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr Brayshaw, Claimant’s partner and lay representative
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing in Leeds on 17 April 2020 before Employment Judge Cox. The claimant was represented by Mr Brayshaw, described in the judgment as the claimant’s partner and lay representative, and the respondent was represented by counsel, Mr Rajgopaul.
The only outcome recorded in the extracted judgment is that the claims for a redundancy payment and arrears of pay were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. No merits findings, liability findings, or remedy assessment are set out in the extracted text.
No legal test is identified in the extracted judgment, and no monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment records that the redundancy payment claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant at the preliminary hearing. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the arrears of pay claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant at the preliminary hearing. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.