Case 3326232/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Hamad & Hu Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3326232/2019
- Decision date
- 13 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a remote hearing at Watford by CVP before Employment Judge de Silva QC on 28 February 2022. The written judgment was dated 1 March 2022 and sent to the parties on 13 March 2022. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by a consultant.
The only substantive decision recorded in the judgment was that the Tribunal did not have territorial jurisdiction to hear the claimant's unlawful deductions from wages claim. The claim was therefore not heard on its merits.
The judgment records that the hearing was remote and that a face-to-face hearing was not held because it was not practicable and all issues could be determined remotely. It also notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the Tribunal's usual practice.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that it did not have territorial jurisdiction to hear this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.