Case 3326259/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Mitie Ltd and other — 2020
- Case reference
- 3326259/2019
- Decision date
- 12 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle JUDGMENT
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Reading on 15 October 2020, Employment Judge Postle recorded that the claimant had not provided a contact telephone number for the case management hearing on 7 August 2020. Following that hearing, the claimant had been ordered to show cause why the claims should not be struck out.
The judgment records that the claimant had confirmed in writing that he did not intend to engage in the Tribunal process. The respondent and the Tribunal had not heard from him showing good cause, or any cause, why the claims should not be struck out.
The tribunal therefore dismissed the claims because the claimant was not actively pursuing them and had clearly indicated that he had no intention of doing so. No substantive determination of liability was made and no monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written record does not identify the underlying cause of action; the judgment disposes of 'the claims' because the claimant was not actively pursuing them and had confirmed in writing that he did not intend to engage in the Tribunal process. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.