Case 3326263/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Flowers v Coretex Technologies Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3326263/2019
- Decision date
- 11 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Flowers
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr J Flowers' claims against Coretex Technologies Ltd were dismissed because they were no longer being actively pursued. The extracted text does not contain any merits findings, liability analysis, or remedy assessment.
The decision is a short case-management style judgment signed by Employment Judge Postle on 3 August 2022 and sent to the parties on 11 August 2022. No hearing panel members are listed in the extracted text, and no legal test is stated in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not itemise the individual claims; it states that the claimant's claims were dismissed because they were no longer being actively pursued. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not itemise the individual claims; it states that the claimant's claims were dismissed because they were no longer being actively pursued. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not itemise the individual claims; it states that the claimant's claims were dismissed because they were no longer being actively pursued. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.