Case 3326266/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Goodman v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 3326266/2019
- Decision date
- 21 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Vowles Date
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr P Goodman
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Revamp Product and Installation Services Ltd did not present a response to the claim. Employment Judge Vowles therefore entered judgment in favour of Mr P Goodman. The only substantive claim recorded in the judgment was unauthorised deduction from wages.
The tribunal stated that the Claimant was owed wages and awarded him £558.08 in compensation. The Respondent was ordered to pay that sum to the Claimant. No other claims, findings, or remedy components were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment entered because the Respondent failed to present a response. The judgment states that the Claimant was owed wages and awarded £558.08 in compensation. | Upheld | — | £558 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £558
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £558
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.