Case 3326267/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D Goodwin v Empathy Care East Anglia Ltd& Others — 2020
- Case reference
- 3326267/2019
- Decision date
- 30 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laidler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs D Goodwin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued by Employment Judge Laidler on 14 April 2020. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages, dismissed her in breach of contract in respect of notice, failed to pay holiday entitlement, failed to pay Statutory Sick Pay, and failed to issue a Statement of Employment Particulars.
The tribunal made gross awards of £365.50 for the unlawful deduction from wages claim, £170.00 for wrongful dismissal in respect of notice, £386.02 for holiday pay, £282.75 for non-payment of SSP, and £340.00 for failure to issue a Statement of Employment Particulars. The total gross award was £1,544.27.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £365.50. | Upheld | — | £366 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £170.00 gross damages. | Upheld | — | £170 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered £386.02 gross. | Upheld | — | £386 |
| Other | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) and ordered £282.75 gross. | Upheld | — | £283 |
| Other | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to issue a Statement of Employment Particulars and ordered £340.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £340 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,544
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.