Case 3326364/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Hendy v Applause Store Productions Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3326364/2019
- Decision date
- 29 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cronin Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Hendy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case remotely by CVP on 16 November 2021 before Employment Judge Cronin. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by a solicitor. The judgment records that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested.
The claimant's claim for unpaid wages succeeded. The tribunal found that claim well-founded and ordered Applause Store Productions Limited to pay £304.46 gross. No separate breakdown of that award was given.
The claimant's complaint of breach of contract, described as non-payment of expenses, was found not well founded and was dismissed. The judgment also records that the claimant's discrimination claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes this as a claim for unpaid wages and orders payment of £304.46 gross. | Upheld | — | £304 |
| Breach of contract | This was the claimant's complaint of non-payment of expenses. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The judgment states that the discrimination claim was withdrawn by the claimant and is dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £304
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.