Case 3326409/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Jones v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 3326409/2019
- Decision date
- 25 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr S Jones
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent, Adept Facilities Group Limited t/a Trojan Property Maintenance, did not present a response to the claim. Under Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, judgment was therefore entered in favour of the claimant, Mr S Jones.
The tribunal found that the claimant was owed unpaid wages and awarded £3,274.48 in compensation. It also found that the claimant was owed holiday pay and awarded a further £904.02 in compensation. The total award recorded on the judgment is £4,178.50.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal recorded that the claimant was owed unpaid wages. Judgment was entered under Rule 21 because the respondent did not present a response. | Upheld | — | £3,274 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal recorded that the claimant was owed holiday pay. Judgment was entered under Rule 21 because the respondent did not present a response. | Upheld | — | £904 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,179
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.