Case 3326412/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Lilley v 2Excel Management Ltd and 2 others — 2021
- Case reference
- 3326412/2019
- Decision date
- 29 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr N Lilley
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 52 withdrawal judgment. The proceedings against 2Excel Management Ltd and 2Excel Aviation Ltd were dismissed after the claimant withdrew those claims, so the tribunal did not determine the merits of those matters.
The complaint under regulation 15 of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 against Gama Aviation (UK) Ltd was also dismissed after withdrawal. The judgment states that this did not affect the remaining complaints against Gama Aviation (UK) Ltd and that the hearing date was not affected. No remedy was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Proceedings against 2Excel Management Ltd were dismissed after the claimant withdrew the claim; the underlying claim type is not specified in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Proceedings against 2Excel Aviation Ltd were dismissed after the claimant withdrew the claim; the underlying claim type is not specified in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | Complaint pursuant to regulation 15 of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 against Gama Aviation (UK) Ltd was dismissed after withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.