Case 3326420/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Taheri v Parkdean Resorts UK Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3326420/2019
- Decision date
- 6 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Warren REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Taheri
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing held at Manchester on 2 July 2020, the tribunal considered the claimant's age discrimination and disability discrimination claims against Parkdean Resorts UK Limited.
The tribunal held that all of those claims had no reasonable prospects of success and were vexatious. It therefore dismissed all of the claims under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure.
The written judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note appended to the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment states that the age discrimination claims had no reasonable prospects of success, were vexatious, and were dismissed under rule 37. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the disability discrimination claims had no reasonable prospects of success, were vexatious, and were dismissed under rule 37. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.